I saw a recent interview where the person being interviewed said, “You’re going to be stuck writing a series or a genre for quite a while.” In fact, the entire tone of the interview was that you should pick a genre and stick with it. I’m not sure I agree with that.
Don’t get me wrong – a writer shouldn’t write something he
or she sucks at. I’ve long criticized
George Lucas for trying to write romantic dialogue in Attack of the Clones
because he just wasn’t up to it. It felt
forced and campy and the kind of thing you’d see in a love note written by a 4th
grader. If the writer can’t pull it off,
then he or she should learn a lot before trying to do so(or at least before
showing it to the general public).
But I think it’s possible to pull off different genres if
you have enough skill. I’ve written
science fiction, paranormal, and political/military thriller. I think each of my stories work because it’s
the story that’s compelling rather than the genre. Beyond that, I feel that limiting yourself to
a genre is confining. The world’s best
don’t do this, and if you want to be the best, you have to find ways to break
out(Harry Turtledove’s Great War saga may be an alternate universe, but it
reads like military fiction; he also branched out into true science fiction
with his WorldWar series).
I think it boils down to knowing your strengths and
weaknesses. Maybe you aren’t yet up to
the task, but that doesn’t mean you brush it off forever. If you want to write Americana or Crime
Drama, then figure out how. Even Stephen
King doesn’t only write horror, so find out if you can translate your strengths
to other areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment