As writers, we know our stuff is brilliant. After all, we wouldn’t have written it down
unless we were certain of said brilliance, right. The problem comes when we want to show the
world that brilliance and put it all into a single story, for it makes our
stories, at times, unnecessarily complex.
As such, the level of complexity can either bore or confuse the reader,
and bored or confused readers don’t buy your books.
One of my still-needs-to-be-rewritten novels fell into this
trap – the sequel to Akeldama.
The novel centers around an ancient enemy returning and being granted
power by the serpent at the end of the previous novel in exchange for a few
favors. The biggest ask revolves around
opening several portals to Hell. Sounds
simple enough, right?
Wrong.
You see, I’ve come across tales of nearly a dozen different
portals to Hell across the world, and I wanted to include them all in the book. I wanted to do this to show how excited I was
about the level of knowledge I’d obtained, which is almost always the wrong
reason to include certain storypoints. I
also wanted a depth of story that was unwarranted, because, excited though I
was, even I knew I couldn’t go through all 11 gates – some had to have been
done “off screen” so as to build the tension and add mystery. Still, I wanted to go through enough of the
gates, and it ended up being a contrived mess rather than anything useful for
the plot. Hence the need for a pretty
big rewrite.
Although it will pain me to do, I will dramatically
prune the story from 11 gates to seven, and at least two will be done away from
the gaze of the reader. That should up
the stakes much more for what the reader does see. And hopefully it’ll get away from what I call
“Christmas Present Syndrome,” whereby there are so many presents that kids just
move from one to the next without appreciating what they just unwrapped.
The lesson in all of this is that we authors need to restrain ourselves sometimes in throwing our story out there. We may enjoy the byzantine maze of subtle plot points, but we have to bear in mind the audience and whether or not they’re up for it. Maybe they are, but we should be objective about it rather than just believe they want to wade through the clouds with us.
No comments:
Post a Comment