I was speaking last week with an old friend of mine named
Kevin. Several years ago, Kevin was a
potentially up-and-coming author who’d secured a literary agent for his book Paws On The Ground. The book is about his time as an MP working
with dogs in Afghanistan, and the title is a take off of the military phrase
“boots on the ground.” It’s a way to say
that you have to be in the thick of things and physically present to have an
impact.
Kevin had gone to a writing conference and an agent was
impressed enough to sign him. That’s
when he learned that maybe literary agents aren’t the best route to go if you
want to get your message out to the public…
His first agent(I’ll get to why he was the “first” in a
second) kept giving him edits and corrections to make. Don’t get me wrong – if something can be made
better, then I’m totally open to someone pointing out what that might be. What I’m not open to is someone who
supposedly works for me – and yes, literary agents work for the writer, not the
other way around – insisting that his or her suggestions must be taken. I’m the writer, and I get to decide what
works best for the story.
There was lots of back and forth, and tons of new
“suggestions,” but the agent never tried even once to submit Kevin’s books to
publishers for sale. Finally fed up,
Kevin fired the guy and turned to a new agent.
This one didn’t offer too much to change, and he sounded like he was enthusiastic
about Kevin’s book. Then…nothing. The guy just disappeared, as if the Earth had
opened up and swallowed him whole. Kevin
hasn’t heard from him in more than two years, and he has basically given up on
anything happening with his work.
Those who know me know of my antipathy towards literary
agents. I think, for the most part, that
they’re useless. To start with, they’re
supposed to be selling your work and negotiating a contract, but every one I’ve
encountered has no background in business or intellectual property law. Most, in fact, have MFA or English degree and
appear to simply want to be writers themselves without running the risk of
putting their own work out there. No,
they’d rather criticize actual writers behind the scenes and then take credit
for what someone else wrote.
Were I to ever decide to go the traditional route for my work(the offer would have to be really high for me to give up the freedom of
indie publishing), I wouldn’t need another literary critic. I’ve got beta readers and people I respect
for critiques. Since reading taste is
subjective, I have to be the final arbiter of whether or not a suggestion makes
sense. What I need instead of another
critic is someone familiar with intellectual property law. What rights do I retain? When do the rights revert back to me? Is the publisher insisting on a
right-of-first-refusal for my next book?
What will the publisher do from a marketing standpoint and what does
that publisher expect me to do? MFAs and
English degrees are great, but they don’t credential someone to determine
whether or not a contract offer is to my advantage. And since the main advantage most of these
agents offer is access to a traditional publisher, it’s more in an agent’s
interest to get better terms for the publisher than for me so that the agent
can stay in the good graces of the publisher.
Most agents rely on the naiveté of new authors to yoke them
into their corral. This had its
merits…25 years ago. However, in the new
age of indie publishing, all it takes is some initiative and common business
sense to get what an agent could. If you
want a traditional contract, then get an intellectual property attorney for
your contract. You can hire your own
cover artist, your own editor, and market your book yourself. Sure, it may not have a big-time publisher’s
name attached, but a lot of successful books don’t have that. Remember that The Martian and Fifty Shadesof Grey both started off as indie-published. It wasn’t a literary agent or traditional
publisher that made them successful.
They were successful the same way IAm Legend or The Shining were
successful – they captured lightning in a bottle and caught a break(luck and
timing are the biggest pieces an agent won’t talk about, pretending instead
that they can make you the next JK Rowling rather than acknowledge that most
books, even those represented by a traditional publisher, don’t earn that kind
of money).
If you want the comfort of having a literary agent, go
ahead, but know that you’re likely making a mistake. Most agents I’ve encountered think they run
things rather than that they work for their client, just like a lawyer or
interior decorator. If you want to
retain your freedom and not worry whether or not someone who has an MFA but has
likely never published in their life approves of you, then eschew the agent
route and put stock in your own abilities.
After all, you have some control over those.
Interesting experience your friend had! Indie publishing does have some positives and I've read the good and the bad (in both traditional publishing and IndiePublishing). Probably the biggest thing I see is often writers self publish too soon. BUT I've read some amazing books and I've run into quite a few indie published authors who make a living (or at least a decent income) off their work!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely! I just want more writers to know that it doesn't take an agent to find success. :-)
Delete