I thought this was understood, but judging by a few comments, many don’t get the difference between writing a novel and blogging. Lots of people seem to think that writing is writing, and if you can blog, you can write a novel, or vice versa. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Blogging is done usually through stream of
consciousness. Although I write out the
subject I want to discuss, along with maybe one or two notes to make sure I hit
those points, it’s very seat-of-the-pants.
The flow is intended to be more of a conversation, and unless we’re part
of a debate club, few of us have notes for conversations(it tends to be
off-putting). The blog post can go off
in any number of directions, and it’s chock full of adjectives and adverbs that
wouldn’t survive editing in novel writing.
Novel writing, on the other hand, is much more
deliberate. I outline what I want to
write, and even though some of it is general so I can allow the story to
develop as I write, there are some pieces of dialogue or action sequences that
I want to be pretty specific, so I’ll write it out very explicitly. Even then, I’ll go back and revise the
sequence to make sure it’s just right.
At the end, I put it away, as opposed to publishing a blog post right
away(or at least on schedule), and then I go back to it and start cutting
words. A 120,000 word manuscript may end
up at 75,000 words once I’ve revised and cut away the fat.
So next time you encounter a novelist who also blogs,
understand that they switch mindsets and styles depending on what they
write. Think of it as the difference
between the teenager who says whatever comes to mind, and the adult who
(hopefully) has a great deal more discernment.
No comments:
Post a Comment