There’s a plague in our country. It sets in when folks are least expecting it,
and it takes once healthy, vibrant pieces of society, and it rots them from the
inside. This plague is hard to
eliminate, as it requires a degree of both foresight and courage many are
loathe to display. Am I talking about
Coronavirus?
Nope. I’m talking
about the woke-scolds who screech and shame until they get their way, and then
they form a shell against anyone not inside that mindset, keeping them from
reclaiming once great organizations.
A recent article from Quillette regarding the Romance
Writers of America caught my eye. RWA,
an organization of around 9000 members, formed in 1980 to promote the interests
of romance writers and the romance genre in general. It flourished for years, building careers and
getting romance novels out of the shadows and into the mainstream. Unfortunately, along the way, those that took
it over either forgot or ignored that the main purpose of romance novels, much
like the main purpose of any novel, is to tell a good story. Instead, it descended into the madness of
identity politics, arguing that stories should be more about inclusion and
political outlook that pushed an agenda rather than keeping readers engrossed
in a great book.
Don’t get me wrong.
I’m all for inclusion, and those who can write good stories should be
welcomed, regardless of race, gender, or sexuality. From my point of view, such characteristics
are irrelevant to someone writing good books.
Moreover, if a writer feels the need to include such details in his or
her work, then do so. The issue is when
such immutable characteristics become the point of the story rather than simply
a part of it.
But beyond dinging people for not being inclusive in the
way you view inclusion, it becomes an even worse sin to ding people for their
political outlook. The RWA, led by
Carolyn Jewel(its President-Elect at the time), decided to excommunicate a
buyer of romance that once worked for Borders Books and had since gained
employment with a small, startup publishing firm as an acquisition
editor(Glenfinnan). Well, the
woke-scolds descended on her boss and the firm because they employed notorious
racist Sue Grimshaw. Her crime? Liking the tweets of a few conservative
political figures, like Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson.
My own thoughts on Carlson and others isn’t relevant. Nothing he says or does impacts me or my life
in any way. He’s a political
commentator, and I’m a writer. With that
out of the way, it’s worth noting that neither Carlson nor Kirk are fringe
figures. They’re pretty mainstream
conservatives. You may dislike their
views, but they’re not Nazis, and caricaturing them as such is a despicable act
that lessens the crimes of the actual Nazis.
Folks like Carlson hold some views folks on the other side of the aisle
dislike. That’s their right as
Americans. Beyond that, it’s nobody’s
business who likes whatever political views.
If the writer puts those views into a story, then criticize the story,
but someone’s personal political outlook is not your business.
The woke-scolds in RWA went after Grimshaw, then her boss,
with a frenzy, doing all they could to destroy them. They cried out that Grimshaw had been engaged
in discriminatory buying when she worked for Borders Books, despite the fact
that book placement, and even romance novels from minority writers, wasn’t part
of her job. Nope, she’d liked a few conservatives,
and Borders had some policies that weren’t as progressive as one might like, so
she was instantly guilty. And as a
guilty racist, she had to be expunged.
Then, the folks that came to her defense, like Suzan Tisdale, were also
branded as racist scum to be purged.
As you can read at the link, as well as this one here, the
entire ordeal descended into madness, led by a few woke-scolds who feel the
need to always be angry. They ranted and
raved about the way the majority of romance novels held their plots, who they
included in those plots, and why they weren’t more risqué. Never mind that on of the big purposes of
being a writer is to sell books, and folks should remember that the audience
decides what to buy and what not to buy based on individual preferences, but
die had been cast, and those not sufficiently woke enough, or unwilling to kowtow properly, were heretics. And it
was at that point that a great number of RWA’s writers decided to say “fuck
it,” and they began walking away in increasing numbers. The entire organization had become a shell of
itself, devoted more to political messaging instead of good stories.
And RWA isn’t alone.
SFWA has also become increasingly more concerned with diversity and
inclusion being the story rather than elements of it, which is why The Hugo
Awards have become such a joke. The
woke-scolds in charge think that the writing community and reading audience
will continue to buy books that suck because they want the message
involved. If that’s the case, then they
don’t know the audience very well.
Most folks don’t have the backbone to fight back. Most will just walk away and try to live in
peace, but it’s the growing fungus of the woke-scolds that makes that an
impossibility if we want to enjoy good stories rather than be dictated to by a commissariat. The woke-scolds have nearly unlimited energy,
fueled by their own rage, and they don’t stop…ever. If we want to overcome them and get back to
writing being about telling good stories again, then we have to oppose them at
every turn. This should not be a left
versus right issue – this should be a freedom issue. If a story is awful enough, then the market
will decide not to buy it. But a group
of hardcore screeching harpies who are mad that their worldview isn’t worshiped by everyone does not get to decide that. Even if you’re normally on the side of those
with the politics that lean that way, I promise that you’ll eventually say or
do the wrong thing, since the goalposts are always shifting. You’ll find yourself in the crosshairs of
some angry mob who thinks you’ve strayed, even if only a little, and you’ll go
down in flames. Remember, even
Robespierre was eventually guillotined.
No comments:
Post a Comment