If you're a writer, chances are that you have a special universe where you would like to set a great deal of your work. This is usually the place our first novel comes from, and it's comforting to return to a familiar setting. After all, don't many readers also demand to see what has happened to their favorite characters over and over and over again(Harry Potter, The Lost Regiment, The Great War saga, etc)?
Here's the problem with that, at least for those of us new to the water - our first novels aren't usually our best work.
I've written a few times about my first full length, novel, On Freedom's Wings. I was swept up by a space opera that I was sure was going to take the world by storm. I had sequels planned. I prepared for years of going back into that universe and imagined all the accolades I'd receive as people returned time after time to see what was happening with the future I'd created. Unfortunately, there was one teeny tiny problem...
My novel sucked. A lot.
So, why is this a concern? After all, don't most writers get better over time as they write and publish more? Absolutely, but we know how the audience is - they won't read the later stuff in a series if the first book stinks. It's counterintuitive to believe that people will join us halfway through a series where book #3 is great but the entry into that world has already jumped the shark.
There is a place for returning to the same universe, but it's usually after you've established yourself as a decent writer. Making it the only place you write from makes it far less likely for folks to give you a chance because all they know is the initial shitty foray you made into that world.
It's daunting to keep figuring out fresh worlds and new ideas, but it's critical to success as a writer, especially new ones. As our writing improves, people can find new novels that expose them to fresh ideas, meaning they can jump into that universe later. However, crappy beginnings usually close people off to our work since most won't venture beyond the first book.
Branch out into other areas, especially when you first start out. Readers will let you know once you've struck gold, and then you can find your happy place.
Here's the problem with that, at least for those of us new to the water - our first novels aren't usually our best work.
I've written a few times about my first full length, novel, On Freedom's Wings. I was swept up by a space opera that I was sure was going to take the world by storm. I had sequels planned. I prepared for years of going back into that universe and imagined all the accolades I'd receive as people returned time after time to see what was happening with the future I'd created. Unfortunately, there was one teeny tiny problem...
My novel sucked. A lot.
So, why is this a concern? After all, don't most writers get better over time as they write and publish more? Absolutely, but we know how the audience is - they won't read the later stuff in a series if the first book stinks. It's counterintuitive to believe that people will join us halfway through a series where book #3 is great but the entry into that world has already jumped the shark.
There is a place for returning to the same universe, but it's usually after you've established yourself as a decent writer. Making it the only place you write from makes it far less likely for folks to give you a chance because all they know is the initial shitty foray you made into that world.
It's daunting to keep figuring out fresh worlds and new ideas, but it's critical to success as a writer, especially new ones. As our writing improves, people can find new novels that expose them to fresh ideas, meaning they can jump into that universe later. However, crappy beginnings usually close people off to our work since most won't venture beyond the first book.
Branch out into other areas, especially when you first start out. Readers will let you know once you've struck gold, and then you can find your happy place.
No comments:
Post a Comment